<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Increase Effectiveness of Your Display Ad with Multivariate Testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketerinsight.com/media-buying/display-ad-multivariate-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketerinsight.com/media-buying/display-ad-multivariate-testing/</link>
	<description>Thought Leadership from Interactive Marketing Agency WebsiteBiz - Delivering Unmatched Results</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:32:09 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.marketerinsight.com/media-buying/display-ad-multivariate-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-1530</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketerinsight.com/?p=2211#comment-1530</guid>
		<description>Huh... I woulda thunk the opposite ad would have been more effective. My thinking would be, yeah, that&#039;s great that when actually noticed that the ad is more effectively read, but my feeling would have been that the gaze might have brought the reader in in the first place. But that is just intuition, I have no data. And besides, the model is hot... I noticed her more when she was doing the gaze. Alas, I am not the target audience tho, am I? 

Guys noticing a hot model won&#039;t necessarily move any SunSilk off any shelves I&#039;m thinking.

Good thoughts for sure! Thanks for the testing ideas! Subtle difference can be huge I see!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh&#8230; I woulda thunk the opposite ad would have been more effective. My thinking would be, yeah, that&#8217;s great that when actually noticed that the ad is more effectively read, but my feeling would have been that the gaze might have brought the reader in in the first place. But that is just intuition, I have no data. And besides, the model is hot&#8230; I noticed her more when she was doing the gaze. Alas, I am not the target audience tho, am I? </p>
<p>Guys noticing a hot model won&#8217;t necessarily move any SunSilk off any shelves I&#8217;m thinking.</p>
<p>Good thoughts for sure! Thanks for the testing ideas! Subtle difference can be huge I see!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
