<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Multivariate Testing Accelerates and Drives Improved Conversion Rates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketerinsight.com/online-marketing/multivariate-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketerinsight.com/online-marketing/multivariate-testing/</link>
	<description>Thought Leadership from Interactive Marketing Agency WebsiteBiz - Delivering Unmatched Results</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 03:08:55 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Dudley</title>
		<link>http://www.marketerinsight.com/online-marketing/multivariate-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Dudley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketerinsight.com/?p=81#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Jonathan- thanks for your comment on multivariate testing.  I agree that the Quickbooks example was not the best for illustrating multivariate testing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan- thanks for your comment on multivariate testing.  I agree that the Quickbooks example was not the best for illustrating multivariate testing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason O'Keefe</title>
		<link>http://www.marketerinsight.com/online-marketing/multivariate-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason O'Keefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketerinsight.com/?p=81#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Hi Eric, nice post - very informative! 

Yes, a 1% increase in conversion rates is very good, but a 11% increase is quite significant-Congratulations! We&#039;d love for you to take a peek at SiteSpect for A/B and multivariate testing (check out: www.sitespect.com). 

We do it without page tagging, so tests are run in a matter of minutes without IT involvement; and it&#039;s a sophisticated platform run as either SaaS or as an enterprise server. Anyway, just wanted to drop a comment to let you know that website testing and targeting can be done quickly without the page tagging. 

Thanks!
Jason O&#039;Keefe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eric, nice post &#8211; very informative! </p>
<p>Yes, a 1% increase in conversion rates is very good, but a 11% increase is quite significant-Congratulations! We&#8217;d love for you to take a peek at SiteSpect for A/B and multivariate testing (check out: <a href="http://www.sitespect.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sitespect.com</a>). </p>
<p>We do it without page tagging, so tests are run in a matter of minutes without IT involvement; and it&#8217;s a sophisticated platform run as either SaaS or as an enterprise server. Anyway, just wanted to drop a comment to let you know that website testing and targeting can be done quickly without the page tagging. </p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Jason O&#8217;Keefe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Mendez</title>
		<link>http://www.marketerinsight.com/online-marketing/multivariate-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Mendez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketerinsight.com/?p=81#comment-79</guid>
		<description>&quot;Using multivariate testing accelerates a marketers ability to yield the best results when comparing to A/B testing.&quot;

Eric- I appreciate your adoption of MVT. I&#039;ve spent much of the past three years evangelizing it myself. However, I wanted to point out that the statement above is not necessarily true. In fact in most scenarios the opposite is true. Many times A/B testing can accomplish better results, with higher confidence, in much less time.

As an example, the Quickbooks tests you reference as MVT were actually  A/B/C tests.

Happy testing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Using multivariate testing accelerates a marketers ability to yield the best results when comparing to A/B testing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Eric- I appreciate your adoption of MVT. I&#8217;ve spent much of the past three years evangelizing it myself. However, I wanted to point out that the statement above is not necessarily true. In fact in most scenarios the opposite is true. Many times A/B testing can accomplish better results, with higher confidence, in much less time.</p>
<p>As an example, the Quickbooks tests you reference as MVT were actually  A/B/C tests.</p>
<p>Happy testing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
