Tag Archive for 'matt cutts'

SES - Black Hat, White Hat: Playing Dirty with SEO

Some say that “black hat” search marketers will do anything to gain a top ranking and others argue that even “white hat” marketers who embrace ethical search engine optimization practices are ultimately trying to game the search ranking system. Are white hats being naive? Are black hats failing to see the long-term picture? This session will include an exploration of the latest black and white issues, with lots of time for dialog and discussion.

Moderator:
Speakers:
Notes:
  • No Presentations will be given. It is a packed session here at SES. Quite a rowdy crowd. The discussion will be town hall format.
  • Definition of Black Hat -
    • Bruce Clay: The search engines define what it is. Most white hats play in the middle; gray hats play on the edge; black hats focus out of bounds
    • Jill Whalen: Attempting to deceive the search engines
  • Definition of White Hat -
    • Todd Friesen: He agrees with Jill’s assessment but brings up the verticals differences
    • Greg Boser: White hat is defined as SEO with no game
    • Dave Naylor: Black Hat is like driving a Porsche in competitive industries
  • Is there risk in both white and black hat techniques?
    • Jill says work hard to make a great website
    • Bruce says if you are working on your site and Matt Cutts comes up behind you, you close your notebook- you are at risk. White Hats color within the lines. Since search engines don’t publish the rules some white hat techniques can appear as black hat even though legitimate.
    • Todd agrees.
    • Greg indicates that most of the black hat techniques are server on his personal site not clients.
    • Jill brings up the idea of incompetent SEOs and the fact that they are the worse group. The crowd agrees!
    • The topic has turned to buying links and what that really means to the search engines. Dave says what does the footprint of a specific tactic look like. Black hats are always testing the limits of link building.
    • Bruce agrees if we spend time working on a project we need to know what the rules are. The question becomes do we take the time or do we buy links.
    • Jill chimes in on the rules…don’t read Google’s guidelines she says it’s common sense. We are all adults. Todd disagrees…this is not common sense.
Questions now coming from the floor.
  • Will links in RSS feeds help?
    The panel defines it as really simple spam (LOL) This could be a dangerous technique.
  • Using widgets effectively could be helpful.
  • The owner of SEOChamp.com chimes in about how black hat techniques are coming from overseas. He really is passionate about how there are 70 parts to the Google algorithm. Matt chimes in at over 200.
  • The challenges between a 1 month vs long term plan. Ticket brokers buy links and it is a tough space.
    • Greg says look at the competitive research and then explain what can be dome and what is the risk tolerance.
  • Affiliate marketing does get a bad rap sometimes. Todd is a big fan of making money. Certain verticals have a hard time following the rules to compete.
  • Bruce says you should take time to build credibility over time and that an aggressive link building techniques can be risky.
  • The BMW brand who was penalized for 72 hours shows that the bigger the brand the easier it is to ask for forgiveness. The interesting fact was they got tons of blog links fro the PR. The BMW SEO work was amateur at best.
  • Now Matt Cutts has asked for the mic: His disclaimer is when we remove sites, they are removed based on the facts not the name. Matt indicates that there is a large subsection of a major newspaper that is currently banned and has been banned for some time. Google does not talk about what sites big or small that they take out. Matt says don’t take the risk.
  • If you are banned you can ask for re-inclusion. Greg says look at the entire space when you choose to ban sites.

Search Marketing Conversation with Google Engineer Matt Cutts

Tom Dressler and Eric Dudley with Matt Cutts from Google

Tom Dressler and Eric Dudley with Matt Cutts from Google

Eric Dudley and Tom Dressler spend time with Google Engineer Matt Cutts at SES San Jose.

SES - Orion Keynote Panel: Technical and Information Giants

SES - Orion Keynote Panel: Technical and Information Giants

Technical and Information Giants with Danny Sullivan, Matt Cutts and Kirsten Mangers

Looking forward to this session as the panel is awesome.

We have an opportunity to see a video featuring various clips referencing search in media today. Very funny South Park clips. As a side note, this session is available on WebmasterRadio.fm for those that want to listen.

Internet-based technologies have shaped the way we seek, collect, and share information. Before innovations can be exploited for marketing purposes, somebody has to build them. More importantly, somebody has to need them. Key innovators, movers, and shakers discuss how the past will shape our future and attempt to answer some of the biggest questions in search. What are the most important changes in the space that you should be aware of? How will the decisions made today affect our marketing and communication efforts in the future?

Moderators:
Speakers:

The first question is about the history of the web and how  we got here. Immediately, conversation has turned to what  Google killer is and how you support this idea from an infrastructure perspective. Danny Sullivan indicates that Microsoft would be the logical candidate but they have tried for the last 5 years with limited success. Danny predicts that there will be incremental Google killers that will be acquired or improved upon by Google. Matt Cutts added that when he left his studies to come to Google he could not find the office and when he did, it was a small room with a desk and a PowerPoint presentation.

Discussion has turned to the data that Google has and how they use it to develop new products as well as there brand being unmatched. Most people don’t care about search or how they search, they just want what they want when they want it…Google provides this experience.

The moderator is now reading off stats about how Google is huge in so many categories. One question is… does Google focus on internal resource development or acquiring technology. Matt Cutts says they do both. Google focuses on scale. Matt references his office mate Ben when he does studies the aggregate volume of data has differences can be huge.

Panelist are discussing the “live” web and how people can search twitter in real time vs. the way Google provides search results. Conversation around local and what that means is a hot topic. Some people are defining local as extension of reach and distribution or find. Urban Spoon is an example of this concept. Local search has a “long way to go” according to the panel due to the mass of data and the usability of that data. Some of the open formats for “local” have a huge opportunity based on where the users are going with the market. This could be an additional layer placed on top of today’s web.

“How do you make things relevant?” Matt talks about broadband and wireless and how these things have improved our life. He cites that 70% of all phones will be smartphones in the next 10 years. Everybody will have them and is this where local will go?

Tim Westergren from Pandora indicated that their business went up significantly when they launched an iPhone app. Discussions still are focused on what local search is and is not.

Kevin Ryan has interjected to change the topic back to “the motherload” as search. The panelist are discussing various examples on how search is being used today. The way people use search and re-search to get what they want quickly is real. Search is right on by providing exactly what someone is looking for vs. traditional outlets that try to push messaging to a “proposed” audience.

Matt Cutts talks about the future of search that delivers a result like this; when ever you search you get a result that creates an awareness opportunity based on where you are.

We are now fielding questions from the audience.